From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261193AbULJNAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:00:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261192AbULJNAl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:00:41 -0500 Received: from tag.witbe.net ([81.88.96.48]:10894 "EHLO tag.witbe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261196AbULJNAd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:00:33 -0500 Message-Id: <200412101300.iBAD0Ua31686@tag.witbe.net> Reply-To: From: "Paul Rolland" To: "'Timothy Chavez'" , Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [audit] Upstream solution for auditing file system objects Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:00:24 +0100 Organization: AS2917 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcTeS7QtH6fS0axtTaOh7iQCRGwcrQAbFymQ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, You could also have a look at LIDS. Though the target is not the same, some useful idea may be gathered there... http://www.lids.org/ Regards, Paul Paul Rolland, rol(at)as2917.net ex-AS2917 Network administrator and Peering Coordinator -- Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur "Some people dream of success... while others wake up and work hard at it" > -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de > Timothy Chavez > Envoyé : vendredi 10 décembre 2004 01:03 > À : linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc : serue@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com; sds@epoch.ncsc.mil; > rml@novell.com; ttb@tentacle.dhs.org > Objet : [audit] Upstream solution for auditing file system objects > > Greetings, > > I'm writing this e-mail to facilitate some discussion on an audit > feature for inclusion to the mainline kernel's audit subsysystem. > I've written out a "brief" description of the problem with some of the > associated problems it introduces and some of the outlines of > potential solutions below. For the most part, the idea stays the > same, and the mechanism we use to implement it varies.