From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262111AbULLUiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Dec 2004 15:38:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262102AbULLUiT (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Dec 2004 15:38:19 -0500 Received: from bristol.swissdisk.com ([65.207.35.130]:49045 "EHLO bristol.swissdisk.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262111AbULLUiC (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Dec 2004 15:38:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:34:52 -0500 From: Ben Collins To: Arne Caspari Cc: Dan Dennedy , Linux1394-Devel , Daniel Drake , Christoph Hellwig , Adrian Bunk , Damien Douxchamps , Parag Warudkar , Andrew Morton , "Randy.Dunlap" , Jesper Juhl , Philippe De Muyter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux1394 patches merged Message-ID: <20041212193452.GB18851@phunnypharm.org> References: <1102556231.3714.14.camel@kino.dennedy.org> <41B94A27.2010801@informatik.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B94A27.2010801@informatik.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Since neither "raw1394" nor "video1394" are drivers specific to the > devices they define matches for, no other ( specialized ) driver can > ever get a device object. I am developing a v4l2 driver for the IIDC > cameras which is based on the "video-2-1394" driver which again is > designed around the device object and the callbacks of the ieee1394 bus > driver. This driver never gets loaded since "raw1394" is the first match > for the device signature and I had to patch "raw1394" and "video1394" > not to match on anything. Maybe we need some sort of priority for device matching, or maybe a "generic" to "specific" probing model. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/