From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261883AbULOFFJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:05:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261887AbULOFFJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:05:09 -0500 Received: from news.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:39388 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261883AbULOFFF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:05:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:04:49 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Lee Revell , Andrea Arcangeli , Manfred Spraul , Zwane Mwaikambo , George Anzinger , dipankar@in.ibm.com, ganzinger@mvista.com, lkml , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch, 2.6.10-rc3] safe_hlt() & NMIs Message-ID: <20041215050449.GI27225@wotan.suse.de> References: <41BB2108.70606@colorfullife.com> <41BB25B2.90303@mvista.com> <41BC0854.4010503@colorfullife.com> <20041212093714.GL16322@dualathlon.random> <41BC1BF9.70701@colorfullife.com> <20041212121546.GM16322@dualathlon.random> <1103060437.14699.27.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041214222307.GB22043@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > But something like > > static inline int kernel_mode(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > return !((regs->eflags & VM_MASK) | (regs->xcs & 3)); > } > > should DTRT. > > Can you pls double-check my thinking, and test? Reasoning looks correct to me. -Andi