From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262173AbULQWKc (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:10:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262145AbULQWKc (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:10:32 -0500 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:51466 "EHLO willy.net1.nerim.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262173AbULQWKU (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:10:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:52:30 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: James Pearson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reducing inode cache usage on 2.4? Message-ID: <20041217215230.GK17946@alpha.home.local> References: <41C316BC.1020909@moving-picture.com> <20041217151228.GA17650@logos.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041217151228.GA17650@logos.cnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marcelo, On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:12:28PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: (...) > The default kernel shrinking ratio can be tuned for enhanced reclaim efficiency. Thanks for having explained this. Up to now, after several series of find or other FS-intensive tasks, I often launched a simple home-made program to which I tell how much memory I want it to allocate (and touch), then it exits freeing this amount of memory. A bit dangerous but really effective indeed ! I too will try to play with vm_vfs_scan_ratio, it seems appealing. Cheers, Willy