From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261156AbULROSy (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 09:18:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261163AbULROSy (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 09:18:54 -0500 Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.237]:10789 "EHLO pfepc.post.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261156AbULROSv (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 09:18:51 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 15:19:35 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: selva kumar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New System call & Kernel compilation Message-ID: <20041218141935.GA15970@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: selva kumar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20041217102631.43898.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041217102631.43898.qmail@web52106.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:26:31AM -0800, selva kumar wrote: > selva: > After adding a new system call, should we have to > recompile the whole kernel? can anyone help me > regarding this? You do not need to do a 'make clean'. Simply executing make will suffer since kbuild has track of all dependencies. Assuming 2.6 kernel! Sam