From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261359AbULTAbZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:31:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261362AbULTAbZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:31:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:32392 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261359AbULTAbW (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:31:22 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:29:58 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Adrian Bunk Cc: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, zaitcev@redhat.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED Message-ID: <20041219162958.6297b8e6@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: <20041220001644.GI21288@stusta.de> References: <20041220001644.GI21288@stusta.de> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12cvs126.2 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 01:16:44 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB > instead of USB_STORAGE? It depends. I like it. > config BLK_DEV_UB > tristate "Low Performance USB Block driver" > - depends on USB > + depends on USB && EMBEDDED The ub has nothing to do with embedded systems, most of which do not run with CONFIG_EMBEDDED, BTW. -- Pete