From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261741AbULULup (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:50:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261743AbULULuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:50:44 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:26020 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261741AbULULuk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2004 06:50:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:46:06 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: "Jose R. Santos" Cc: Andi Kleen , "Martin J. Bligh" , Brent Casavant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving Message-ID: <20041221114605.GB21710@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <50260000.1103061628@flay> <20041215045855.GH27225@wotan.suse.de> <20041215144730.GC24000@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041216050248.GG32718@wotan.suse.de> <20041216051323.GI24000@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041216141814.GA10292@rx8.austin.ibm.com> <20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041220165629.GA21231@rx8.austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The difference between the two runs was with in noise of the benchmark on > my small setup. I wont be able to get a larger NUMA system until next year, > so I'll retest when that happens. In the mean time, I don't see a reason > either to stall this patch, but that may change on I get numbers on a > larger system. Thanks Jose! Brent, looks like we are happy on the ppc64 front. Anton