From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261700AbULZQkc (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:40:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261703AbULZQkc (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:40:32 -0500 Received: from cimice4.lam.cz ([212.71.168.94]:14210 "EHLO beton.cybernet.src") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261700AbULZQk2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:40:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 16:40:51 +0000 From: Karel Kulhavy To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: description of struct sockaddr Message-ID: <20041226164051.GA5529@beton.cybernet.src> References: <20041123214300.GB2147@beton.cybernet.src> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Orientation: Gay Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >Hello > > > >man netdevice talks about struct sockaddr, but neither describes it, > >nor provides a link to descriptio, nor the "SEE ALSO" items > >(ip(7), proc(7), rnetlink(7)) provide the necessary information. > > > >"The hardware address is specified in a struct sockaddr". > > I don't think so. The hardware address is, well, specific to the hardware (like > Ethernet, for example). IP/TCP/UDP however is not limited to Ethernet. And > 'sockaddr' clearly is something that does not deal with hardware. It is a sentence from man netdevice. Should I send a bugreport to the manpage maintainer? Cl<