From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261222AbUL1T2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:28:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261228AbUL1T2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:28:06 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.226.105]:21680 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261222AbUL1T2E (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:28:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:26:35 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: 2.6.10 - Misrouted IRQ recovery for review Message-Id: <20041228112635.5ec9a2d1.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <200412281421.49044.dtor_core@ameritech.net> References: <1104249508.22366.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200412281350.44195.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20041228105330.6da0f0ea.davem@davemloft.net> <200412281421.49044.dtor_core@ameritech.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:21:49 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Well, it kind of does... I mean if register dump is somehow requested > from outside of interrupt context then you'll get dump of the next hard > IRQ. The same goes for softirqs I guess. Oh yes, that's right. I remember one of the USB host controller driver authors wanting to do URB processing in softirq context and he couldn't because of the input layer using the pt_regs.