From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261538AbUL3COj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261535AbUL3COj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:39 -0500 Received: from MAIL.13thfloor.at ([212.16.62.51]:18587 "EHLO mail.13thfloor.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261519AbUL3CMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:12:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 03:12:39 +0100 From: Herbert Poetzl To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , Networking Team , linux-net , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Patch: add loglevel to printk's in net/ipv4/route.c Message-ID: <20041230021239.GA31474@mail.13thfloor.at> Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Juhl , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , Networking Team , linux-net , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , linux-kernel References: <41D2104D.3010406@conectiva.com.br> <41D2120E.8030008@conectiva.com.br> <20041229021256.GD29323@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <41D2152F.8080501@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Jörn Engel wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for > > > > > > completeness/correctness. > > > > > > > > > > No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > hint: look for "\n" > > > > > > hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8) > > > > > > > Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll > > take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have > > things to do). > > Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have. > > > > > Ok, this is a bit embarresing. Looking at the patch now after getting some > sleep it's quite obvious that it is wrong. I should have slept on it > before sending it - sorry for the noise people. nothing to be sorry about, and thanks for all the work you are doing for the linux kernel ... best, Herbert > -- > Jesper Juhl > > > >