From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261550AbUL3MAe (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:00:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261609AbUL3MAe (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:00:34 -0500 Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr ([213.228.0.169]:42474 "EHLO postfix3-2.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261550AbUL3MAa (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:00:30 -0500 From: Duncan Sands To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10 and speedtouch usb Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:00:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Roman Kagan , Serge Tchesmeli References: <200412271108.47578.zztchesmeli@echo.fr> <20041229161829.GA9076@panda.itep.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041229161829.GA9076@panda.itep.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412301300.30105.duncan.sands@math.u-psud.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It looks like the line status monitoring implemented in the driver in > 2.6.10 interferes with that in modem_run. Unless you have a reason to > keep using modem_run, you can let it go and use the line status > monitoring and firmware loading facilities provided by the driver > itself. Just follow Andrew's advice. Hi Roman, yes, but it would be good to understand what is going wrong - the debug info should help. It would also be good to know the modem revision. Serge, what revision do you see in /proc/bus/usb/devices? All the best, Duncan.