From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261661AbUL3QqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:46:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261671AbUL3QqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:46:00 -0500 Received: from rekin12.go2.pl ([193.17.41.32]:64432 "EHLO rekin12.go2.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261661AbUL3Qps (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:45:48 -0500 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Fryderyk_Mazurek?= To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Bill_Davidsen?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Re:_Problems_with_2.6.10?= Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:45:46 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: o2.pl WebMail v5.27 X-Originator: 83.31.160.247 In-Reply-To: <41D3646A.9020806@tmr.com> References: <1104201851.18175.39.camel@d845pe><20041227171159.51454193BFA@r10.go2.pl> <20041228145600.6A9FC193D36@r10.go2.pl> <41D3646A.9020806@tmr.com> Message-Id: <20041230164546.987845674D@rekin12.go2.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! I'm sorry, but acpi=routeirq doesn't work. But to my head came other thing. I noticed that I on 2.6.9 (which correct works) I have this part of dmesg: hdb: Host Protected Area detected. current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) hdb: 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, UDMA(33) and on 2.6.10 I have: hdb: Host Protected Area detected. current capacity is 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) native capacity is 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) hdb: Host Protected Area disabled. hdb: 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, UDMA(33) How see, first is 32GB (33820 MB), and second is 40GB (40020MB). Correct value should be 32GB, in spite that my disk is 40GB. I want to say, that I have a little old BIOS and my BIOS detect only 32GB, therefore I have limited size of my disk. And maybe kernel 2.6.10 influence on my BIOS and force to detect 40GB, which is not operable, because my BIOS is too old. I think that maybe to fix it I should force my kernel to detect only 32GB, how on kernel 2.6.9. Maybe this is a BUG of new kernel? Fryderyk. ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ---- Od: Bill Davidsen Do: Fryderyk Mazurek Kopia do: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Data: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:14:02 -0500 Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10 > Fryderyk Mazurek wrote: > > Hello. > > > > My kernel 2.6.10 I compiled two times. First with ACPI and second > > fully without ACPI. And the same situation. > > For me this situation is strange, because usually reset should help, > > but not this time. I thought that maybe my BIOS is too old. But with > > 2.6.9 works. Therefore I don't know. Now I use 2.6.9. > > > > Fryderyk. > > > > ---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ---- > > Od: Len Brown > > Do: Fryderyk Mazurek > > Kopia do: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Data: 27 Dec 2004 21:44:11 -0500 > > Temat: Re: Problems with 2.6.10 > > > > > >>On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 12:11, Fryderyk Mazurek wrote: > >> > >> > >>>problem starts when I do reboot. On boot screen my bios can't detect > >>>my disk. Bios stops and nothing. > >> > >>Does reboot work if the initial boot is with acpi=off? > > With that system, perhaps acpi=ht would be better if he uses the HT. And > pci=routeirq may help as well, although it told me it was disabling > IRQ18 and didn't! > > -- > bill davidsen > CTO TMR Associates, Inc > Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 >