From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sds@epoch.ncsc.mil, chrisw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] track capabilities in default dummy security module code
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:24:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050104152409.C2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104133313.D469@build.pdx.osdl.net>; from chrisw@osdl.org on Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:33:13PM -0800
* Chris Wright (chrisw@osdl.org) wrote:
> Switch dummy logic around to set cap_* bits during exec and set*uid based
> on basic uid check. Then check cap_* bits during capable() (rather than
> doing basic uid check). This ensures that capability bits are properly
> initialized in case the capability module is later loaded.
OK, somehow I managed to botch this one. It happens to work fine, but I
should have been more careful with forward porting this 1+ year old patch.
The exec-time calc should go in bprm_apply_creds, not bprm_free_security.
Thanks to Stephen for spotting my mistake.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
===== security/dummy.c 1.50 vs edited =====
--- 1.50/security/dummy.c 2005-01-04 13:14:10 -08:00
+++ edited/security/dummy.c 2005-01-04 14:45:31 -08:00
@@ -180,7 +180,6 @@ static int dummy_bprm_alloc_security (st
static void dummy_bprm_free_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
- dummy_capget(current, ¤t->cap_effective, ¤t->cap_inheritable, ¤t->cap_permitted);
return;
}
@@ -197,6 +196,8 @@ static void dummy_bprm_apply_creds (stru
current->suid = current->euid = current->fsuid = bprm->e_uid;
current->sgid = current->egid = current->fsgid = bprm->e_gid;
+
+ dummy_capget(current, ¤t->cap_effective, ¤t->cap_inheritable, ¤t->cap_permitted);
}
static int dummy_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-04 21:33 Chris Wright
2005-01-04 23:24 ` Chris Wright [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050104152409.C2357@build.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®