From: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
To: James Nelson <james4765@cwazy.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, lethal@linux-sh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH /3] sh64: remove cli()/sti() from arch/sh64/*
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:34:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050105023405.GE26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050105022304.22296.7672.51691@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:22:47PM -0600, James Nelson wrote:
> This series of patches is to remove the last cli()/sti() function calls in arch/sh64.
Wait a minute. Is that just a blanket search-and-replace job? There is
a reason why cli/sti is marked obsolete instead of being silently #define'd
that way. Namely, in a lot of cases users of cli/sti are actually racy.
For such instances replacing these with local_... would not improve anything
(obviously) *and* would hide a trouble spot by silencing a warning.
I'm not familiar with the architectures in question, so it might very well
be that all replacements so far had been correct. However, I would really
like to see rationale for each of those warning removals to go along with
the patches.
Note that basically you are doing "remove the warning in foo.c:42 and
keep the current behaviour". The missing part is "current behaviour is,
in fact, correct in that place and does not deserve a warning because
<list of reasons>".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-05 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-05 2:22 James Nelson
2005-01-05 2:22 ` [PATCH /3] sh64: remove cli()/sti() in arch/sh64/kernel/time.c James Nelson
2005-01-05 2:34 ` Al Viro [this message]
2005-01-05 3:11 ` [PATCH /3] sh64: remove cli()/sti() from arch/sh64/* Jim Nelson
2005-01-05 17:28 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050105023405.GE26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=james4765@cwazy.co.uk \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome