From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261630AbVAMUHH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:07:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261618AbVAMUGs (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:06:48 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:384 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261554AbVAMUDn (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:03:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:02:27 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: George Anzinger Cc: Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: VST patches ported to 2.6.11-rc1 Message-ID: <20050113200227.GE2599@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20050113132641.GA4380@elf.ucw.cz> <41E6CAAA.4040804@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E6CAAA.4040804@mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >I really hate sf download system... Here are those patches (only > >common+i386) ported to 2.6.11-rc1. > > > >BTW why is linux-net@vger listed as maintainer of HRT? > > Oops, should be linux-kernel... > > If you could send these as seperate attachments (4 different patches, > me thinks), I will put them in the CVS system and on the site. > Merging was quite easy and I'm not 100% sure I did it right; I do not think it would be suitable for cvs. Pavel -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms