From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262200AbVAOFOm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:14:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262206AbVAOFOm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:14:42 -0500 Received: from dsl-kpogw5jd0.dial.inet.fi ([80.223.105.208]:38083 "EHLO safari.iki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262200AbVAOFOk (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:14:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:14:38 +0200 From: Sami Farin <7atbggg02@sneakemail.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb key oddities with 2.6.10-ac9 Message-ID: <20050115051438.GC8456@m.safari.iki.fi> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050115031532.DAA6F1DC100@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050115031532.DAA6F1DC100@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:15:32PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote: > Alan, > I don't see any changes in how Fedora's 2.6.10 kernels are built > that should effect USB hotplugging. The previous kernel I was using > shows... ... > ps Fedora did switch with 2.6.10 from using usbdevfs to using usbfs > but they modified their initscripts package to handle that change. what about this initscripts change 8.01 --> 8.03? - sysctl -w kernel.hotplug="/sbin/hotplug" >/dev/null 2>&1 + sysctl -w kernel.hotplug="/sbin/udevsend" >/dev/null 2>&1 --