mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild: Implicit dependence on the C compiler
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:05:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050118190513.GA16120@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41EC363D.1090106@zytor.com>

Hi hpa
> >It better be difficult. You want to recompile when changing gcc.
> >Try this untested patch.
> Sorry, but that's baloney.  Saying "it better be difficult" is 
> equivalent to saying "kbuild is smarter than you."

To give some background info about why kbuild does what it does.
A kernel being compiled partly with and partly without say -regparm=3
will result in a non-workable kernel.

The same goes for a kernel that is partly built using gcc 2.96, partly
using 3.3.4 for example.

So kbuild pr. default will force a recompile for any .o file where
opions to gcc differ, or name of gcc has changed. Today no check has
been implemented to check the actual gcc executable timestamp - and
neither is this planned.

Default behaviour today is to recompile if anything change.

But as hpa points outs this hits us with nfs mounted kernel tree when
performing a make install - because install has vmlinux as prerequsite.
So this leaves us with at least two possibilitites:
1) Unconditionally execute make install assuming vmlinux is up-to-date.
   make modules_install run unconditionally, so this is already know
   practice
2) Detect that aother user is running the build - and therefore skip
   the kernel and the module build.
   This is a rather intrusive change since with current kbuild structure
   it is rather difficult to stop this in all relevant cases.

	Sam

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 21:40 H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-17 22:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-01-17 22:03   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-17 22:13     ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-01-17 22:47       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-18 19:05     ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2005-01-18 19:35       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-19  1:26         ` Matt Mackall
2005-01-19  3:35           ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-01-19  4:42             ` Marcin Dalecki
2005-01-29 21:26     ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-01-30  1:17       ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found] <fa.e2phu9o.1c30pig@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.gakt9b5.1klcr9h@ifi.uio.no>
2005-01-19 16:09   ` Bodo Eggert
2005-01-19 16:35     ` linux-os
2005-01-19 17:15       ` Sytse Wielinga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050118190513.GA16120@mars.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome