On Friday, 21 of January 2005 13:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 21 of January 2005 03:23, hugang@soulinfo.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 20 of January 2005 21:59, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sure, but I think it's there for a reason.
> > > 
> > > > Anyway, this is likely to clash with hugang's work; I'd prefer this not to be applied.
> > > 
> > > I am aware of that, but you are not going to merge the hugang's patches soon, are you?
> > > If necessary, I can change the patch to work with his code (hugang, what do you think?).
> > > 
> > I like this patch, And I change my code with this, Please have a look,
> > It pass in qemu X86_64. :)
> 
> Looks good.  I'll test it later today.

It works, but I had to change the "core" patch, so that it applied cleanly to
a "fresh" 2.6.11-rc1-mm2 (the patch that I used is attached).  I also removed
some "pr_debug()" statemets that didn't help me at all. :-)

I noticed that it was significantly slower at writing to and reading from swap
than the unpatched swsusp.

Greets,
RJW


-- 
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
		-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"