From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:43:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050124214356.6bed35ac.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501242144120.3010@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I pressed a key on a VT during boot and got the following;
>
> usb-storage: device scan complete
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:104!
> invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
> PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c01314af>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010017 (2.6.11-rc2-mm1)
> EIP is at queue_work+0x8f/0xa0
> eax: f5ebe0e4 ebx: f5ebe0e0 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000000
> esi: c19adef8 edi: 00000000 ebp: f5e4fe14 esp: f5e4fe08
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process udev.hotplug (pid: 1351, threadinfo=f5e4e000 task=f5817ac0)
> Stack: c1815000 0000001c 00000001 f5e4fe20 c0388d3d c1815000 f5e4fe2c c03890c1
> 00000002 f5e4fe64 c0389be1 f5e4ffc4 c011a7b8 00000000 00000002 00000086
> 00000001 00000020 c1815000 f5e4ffc4 00000001 f7b09674 0000001c f5e4fe80
> Call Trace:
> [<c010403a>] show_stack+0x7a/0x90
> [<c01041c6>] show_registers+0x156/0x1c0
> [<c01043e0>] die+0x100/0x190
> [<c0104819>] do_invalid_op+0xa9/0xc0
> [<c0103cc7>] error_code+0x2b/0x30
> [<c0388d3d>] fn_enter+0x1d/0x60
> [<c03890c1>] k_spec+0x31/0x50
> [<c0389be1>] kbd_keycode+0x1a1/0x300
> [<c0389dd3>] kbd_event+0x93/0xf0
> [<c04d2963>] input_event+0xd3/0x3b0
> [<c04d74cf>] atkbd_report_key+0x2f/0x70
> [<c04d76fe>] atkbd_interrupt+0x1ee/0x510
> [<c03abbf3>] serio_interrupt+0x43/0x74
> [<c03ac84d>] i8042_interrupt+0x17d/0x270
> [<c0141e8a>] handle_IRQ_event+0x2a/0x60
I can't reproduce it from a quick test here. I'd assume that the keystroke
came in before the vt's workqueue is initialised. fn_enter() calls
put_queue() calls con_schedule_flip() calls schedule_work() which goes BUG:
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry));
I bet the list_head pointers are null.
Roman might have a theory?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-25 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-25 4:45 Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-25 5:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-01-25 7:23 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-01-25 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-25 10:27 ` Roman Zippel
2005-01-25 14:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050124214356.6bed35ac.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®