From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: kernel bad access while booting diskless client
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:23:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050127142333.0ba81907.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050127215619.56535.qmail@web52309.mail.yahoo.com>
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a kernel Oops while booting 2.6.11-rc2-mm1
> on a diskless (nfsroot based) embedded ppc system.
> Vanilla 2.6.11-rc2 works Ok.
>
> [...]
> VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) readonly.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 112k init
> INIT: version 2.86 booting
> Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> [...]
> TASK = c1643ae0[1] 'init' THREAD: c1646000
> Last syscall: 106
> [...]
> NIP [c0060934] vfs_getattr+0x1c/0xa8
> LR [c0060a14] vfs_stat+0x54/0x64
> Call trace:
> [c0060a14] vfs_sysstat+0x54/0x64
> [c0060f24] sys_newstat+0x1c/0x54
> [c0003c40] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x44
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>
>
> The cause of the bad access is a null inode->i_op
> field that is passed to vfs_getattr() through the
> corresponding struct dentry.
> It triggers when vfs_getattr() blindly tries to check
> inode->i_op->getattr without first checking that
> inode->i_op is useable.
>
> The attached patch workarounds the problem, by
> checking inode->i_op before using it.
>
> It is still unknown to me which code change is causing
> now the appearance of the null i_op field on -rc2-mm1.
> But probably you guys have better clues than me.
>
OK, that's super-helpful, thanks.
> --- a/fs/stat.c 2004-12-24 22:34:02.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/fs/stat.c 2005-01-27 00:52:15.000000000 +0100
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int vfs_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, st
> if (retval)
> return retval;
>
> - if (inode->i_op->getattr)
> + if (inode->i_op && inode->i_op->getattr)
> return inode->i_op->getattr(mnt, dentry, stat);
>
> generic_fillattr(inode, stat);
>
>
>
Can you tell us which filesystem is being bad? Add this:
if (!inode->i_op)
printk("%s is naughty\n", inode->i_sb->s_id);
It's probably NFS - there has been some work done in there in -mm.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-27 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-27 21:56 Albert Herranz
2005-01-27 22:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-01-27 22:43 ` Albert Herranz
2005-01-27 22:50 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2005-01-27 23:00 ` Albert Herranz
2005-01-27 23:03 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2005-01-27 23:10 ` Albert Herranz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050127142333.0ba81907.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®