From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262897AbVA2KKe (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:10:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262894AbVA2KJt (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:09:49 -0500 Received: from arnor.apana.org.au ([203.14.152.115]:8709 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262892AbVA2KIa (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:08:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:06:56 +1100 To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" Cc: wweissmann@gmx.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, 282492@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: multiple neighbour cache tables for AF_INET Message-ID: <20050129100656.GA13584@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <24939.1106917237@www31.gmx.net> <20050129.074605.78506312.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050129.074605.78506312.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Herbert Xu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:46:05AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > In article (at Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:19:49 +1100), Herbert Xu says: > > > IMHO you need to give the user a way to specify which table they want > > to operate on. If they don't specify one, then the current behaviour > > of choosing the first table found is reasonble. > > We have dev. Isn't is sufficient? It could be used for neigh_add/neigh_delete. We'll need to add a way to query whether a given table is the right one for a device. For dump it isn't the same. However, perhaps it's not too important to query a specific table. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt