mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.10 ACPI on dell inspiron 8100
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:30:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050130233000.GB2781@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050129003448.GA24375@animx.eu.org>

Hi!

> I noticed something strange with ACPI and the battery:
> /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1$ cat info 
> present:                 yes
> design capacity:         57420 mWh
> last full capacity:      57420 mWh
> battery technology:      rechargeable
> design voltage:          14800 mV
> design capacity warning: 3000 mWh
> design capacity low:     1000 mWh
> capacity granularity 1:  200 mWh
> capacity granularity 2:  200 mWh
> model number:            LIP8084DLP
> serial number:           20495
> battery type:            LION
> OEM info:                Sony Corp.
> /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1$ cat state 
> present:                 yes
> capacity state:          ok
> charging state:          charging
> present rate:            unknown
> remaining capacity:      59040 mWh
> present voltage:         16716 mV
> /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1$
> 
> Is my laptop messed up or is ACPI not seeing proper values?  How can I have
> 59040 remaining capacity when it the full capacity is 57420?  Also the
> system didn't display the charging light so I know it's not charging.

That actually looks okay. Perhaps battery now stores more energy than
it did last time. Different temperature or something. I'd not worry
about this one.

I have machine where last full capacity is quite a bit bigger than
design capacity; and that's okay, too.

Heh, but your battery gives 2V more than design voltage. That is
slightly "interesting". Perhaps your voltage sensor is wrong and
that's why remaining capacity is so high... Or perhaps your battery is
slightly better than it should be.

								Pavel
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!

      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-30 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-29  0:34 Wakko Warner
2005-01-30 23:30 ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050130233000.GB2781@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®