From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlan@sgi.com
Subject: Re: move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:05:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050203150551.4d88f210.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502031436460.26183@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> I hope that Roland's changes for higher resolution of cputime would
> make that possible. But this is Jay's thing not mine. I just want to make
> sure that the CSA patches does not get in the way of our attempts to
> improve the performance of the page fault handler. In the discussions on
> linux-mm there was also some concern about adding these calls.
Well your patch certainly cleans things up in there and would be a good
thing to have as long as we can be sure that it doesn't break the
accounting in some subtle way.
Which implies that we need to see some additional accounting code, so we
can verify that the base accumulation infrastructure is doing the expected
thing. As well as an ack from the interested parties. Does anyone know
what's happening with all the new accounting initiatives? I'm seeing no
activity at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-03 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050110184617.3ca8d414.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502031319440.25268@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20050203140904.7c67a144.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-02-03 22:45 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Christoph Lameter
2005-02-03 23:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-02-04 0:41 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Tim Schmielau
2005-02-04 7:38 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-07 14:11 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Jay Lan
2005-02-07 22:57 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Andrew Morton
2005-02-08 10:11 ` move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Guillaume Thouvenin
2005-02-03 21:22 move-accounting-function-calls-out-of-critical-vm-code-paths.patch Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050203150551.4d88f210.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®