From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ian Godin <Ian.Godin@lowrydigital.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Drive performance bottleneck
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:32:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050204013204.378cbbee.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4fc982390674caa2eae4f252bf4fc78@lowrydigital.com>
Ian Godin <Ian.Godin@lowrydigital.com> wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to get very fast disk drive performance and I am seeing
> some interesting bottlenecks. We are trying to get 800 MB/sec or more
> (yes, that is megabytes per second). We are currently using
> PCI-Express with a 16 drive raid card (SATA drives). We have achieved
> that speed, but only through the SG (SCSI generic) driver. This is
> running the stock 2.6.10 kernel. And the device is not mounted as a
> file system. I also set the read ahead size on the device to 16KB
> (which speeds things up a lot):
> ...
> samples % symbol name
> 848185 8.3510 __copy_to_user_ll
> 772172 7.6026 do_anonymous_page
> 701579 6.9076 _spin_lock_irq
> 579024 5.7009 __copy_user_intel
> 361634 3.5606 _spin_lock
> 343018 3.3773 _spin_lock_irqsave
> 307462 3.0272 kmap_atomic
> 193327 1.9035 page_fault
Something funny is happening here - it looks like there's plenty of CPU
capacity left over.
It's odd that you're getting a lot of pagefaults in this test but not with
the sg_dd test, too. I wonder why dd is getting so many pagefaults? (I
recall that sg_dd did something cheaty, but I forget what it was).
Could you monitor the CPU load during the various tests? If the `dd'
workload isn't pegging the CPU then it could be that there's something
wrong with the I/O submission patterns.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-04 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-03 2:24 Ian Godin
2005-02-03 3:56 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-02-03 16:49 ` Ian Godin
2005-02-03 16:06 ` Jens Axboe
2005-02-03 17:40 ` Nuno Silva
2005-02-03 18:08 ` Ian Godin
2005-02-03 19:03 ` Paulo Marques
2005-02-04 19:36 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-02-04 9:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-02-04 22:51 ` Lincoln Dale
2005-02-04 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-06 4:25 ` Nuno Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050204013204.378cbbee.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Ian.Godin@lowrydigital.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome