From: Itsuro Oda <oda@valinux.co.jp>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
fastboot <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: kdump on non-boot cpu
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:02:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050204144438.18F9.ODA@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1fz0d9mag.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Hi,
> The reason I was asking and assuming you had a 32bit kernel is that
> you were quoting pieces of arch/i386/kernel/crash.c instead of
> arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c
Using "arch/i386/kernel/crash.c" is just for explanation how we avoid
the hang. (I found x86_64 kdump is not supported in 2.6.11-rc2-mm1 :-))
The attached log is a log of running mkdump (it supports x86_64). not kdump.
The basic procedure before jumping new kernel is almost same as kdump.
So I inform this infromation to you since I think it may be helpfull
for kdump development.
> Ok. Thanks. This is a legitimate bug. And it is probably the reason
> I even care about the non-SMP interrupt case some days. The problem
> is that the kernel just assumes interrupts are setup in non-APIC mode
> when it starts booting, and quite possibly only the bootstrap cpu can
> see those interrupts.
>
> So I believe the fix needs to be to enable apics before we calibrate
> the delay timer. I'm not certain off the top of my head what that
> patch will look like but it should not be fundamentally hard.
> With that code in place we also don't need to do any APIC shutdown
> as the kernel knows enough to completely setup the apics.
I see. Thank you for your explanation.
Thanks.
--
Itsuro ODA <oda@valinux.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-04 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-03 5:12 Itsuro Oda
2005-02-03 6:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-02-03 8:37 ` Itsuro Oda
2005-02-03 9:58 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
2005-02-03 23:43 ` Itsuro Oda
2005-02-04 0:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-02-04 6:02 ` Itsuro Oda [this message]
2005-02-07 7:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050204144438.18F9.ODA@valinux.co.jp \
--to=oda@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®