From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S274996AbVBFK3W (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 05:29:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275020AbVBFK3W (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 05:29:22 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:21939 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S274996AbVBFK3O (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2005 05:29:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 02:29:06 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.11-rc3-bk: something very wrong with top Message-Id: <20050206022906.13ece818.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050206092335.GA1488@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050206092335.GA1488@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > There seem to be some problems with top: > > top - 10:19:24 up 4 min, 3 users, load average: 0.74, 0.48, 0.21 > Tasks: 58 total, 2 running, 56 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 55.1% us, 6.4% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 38.5% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si > Mem: 1031424k total, 72840k used, 958584k free, 8804k buffers > Swap: 1953464k total, 5452k used, 1948012k free, 34860k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 967 root 34 19 2128 620 456 R 0.6 0.1 0:00.35 top > 1 root 16 0 1580 80 56 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.27 init > 2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 > 3 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.31 events/0 > 4 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper > 9 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread > 21 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid > 97 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 kblockd/0 > 269 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush > > ...while compiling kernel, 50%+ time is spent in gcc, but top does not > show it, or it shows it with something like 3% :-(. Same problem seems > to be in 2.6.10-rc3... Does anybody else see that? I can't say that I can see any difference between 2.6.10 and tip-of-tree. In fact 2.4 does the same thing: cc1 is either not shown at all or is shown as taking just a few percent CPU. Occasionally it blips up to 50% or more. Presumably cc1 just doesn't run long enough for it to register. How fast is your CPU?