From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261683AbVBHXWC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:22:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261684AbVBHXWC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:22:02 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:32456 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261683AbVBHXV7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:21:59 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] swsusp: do not use higher order allocations on resume [update 2] Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:22:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: LKML , Nigel Cunningham , Hu Gang References: <200501310019.39526.rjw@sisk.pl> <200502081929.19503.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050208224202.GD1347@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050208224202.GD1347@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502090022.52629.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 8 of February 2005 23:42, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > +static inline void eat_page(void *page) { > > Please put { on new line. Oh, I still tend to forget about this. Corrected in the patch that is available on the web (http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/patches/2.6.11-rc3-mm1/swsusp-use-list-resume-v4.patch). > Okay, as you can see, I could find very little wrong with this > patch. That hopefully means it is okay ;-). I should still check error > handling, but I guess I'll do it when it is applied because it is hard > to do on a diff. I guess it should go into -mm just after 2.6.11 is > released... That would be great! Greets, Rafael -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"