From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261928AbVBIVS3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:18:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261927AbVBIVS3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:18:29 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-197-226-105.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.226.105]:15066 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261931AbVBIVRt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:17:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:17:10 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Einar =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCck?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3 Message-Id: <20050209131710.00315044.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <420A75BF.1080106@einar-lueck.de> References: <41C6B54F.2020604@einar-lueck.de> <20050202172333.4d0ad5f0.davem@davemloft.net> <420A1011.1030602@einar-lueck.de> <20050209120157.18dc75c1.davem@davemloft.net> <420A715D.7050106@einar-lueck.de> <20050209123004.2d65e1cf.davem@davemloft.net> <420A75BF.1080106@einar-lueck.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:42:39 +0100 Einar Lück wrote: > We considered the routing case: in the routing case ip_route_input is called. > In this case we just select the first route in the cache which is always the same > (we ensure that). Consequently, the routing behaviour is not changed in this case and > remains in the way you like it. Indeed. You're right. Let me re-review your second patch with this new understanding in mind :-)