mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: "ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Ext2/3 32-bit stat() wrap for ~2TB files
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:50:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050211225047.GF16520@schnapps.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1108157964.1944.209.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1308 bytes --]

On Feb 11, 2005  21:39 +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> ...i_blocks is counted in fs blocksize units, so we're nowhere near
> overflowing that.  It's only when stat() converts it to st_blocks'
> 512-byte units that we get into trouble within the kernel.

Umm, I don't think so.  ext3 i_blocks is sectors and not fs blocks (one of
my pet peeves actually).  In 2.4 it is as below, 2.6 has one more copy.

ext3_read_inode()
{
	:
	inode->i_blocks = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_blocks);

cp_new_stat()
{
	:
	tmp.st_blocks = inode->i_blocks;


I've wondered at times whether it might make sense to store i_blocks in
fs blocksize units when we add some new feature (e.g. high bits for
i_blocks if we overflow 2^32) but I'm not sure the increased complexity
makes up for the minor increase in dynamic range.

In the end, we hit the 2^64 fs size limit before we would run out of
range for i_blocks (assuming 64 bits there) so changing it doesn't help
much.  The only reason to change would be to store up to 2^48 fs blocks
(only using 16 bits in the core inode, e.g. i_frag + i_fsize) and assume
we need to use 2^16 blocksize for the largest files with extents.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://members.shaw.ca/adilger/             http://members.shaw.ca/golinux/


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2005-02-11 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-11 20:52 Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-02-11 21:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-02-11 21:39   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-02-11 22:50     ` Andreas Dilger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050211225047.GF16520@schnapps.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alex@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®