From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261458AbVBRTJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:09:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261456AbVBRTJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:09:53 -0500 Received: from atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com ([64.74.124.160]:13007 "EHLO bastet.signetmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261453AbVBRTJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:09:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:09:45 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Maciej Soltysiak Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: eepro100 or e100 Message-ID: <20050218190945.GA17443@havoc.gtf.org> References: <173098725.20050218200111@dns.toxicfilms.tv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <173098725.20050218200111@dns.toxicfilms.tv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0100, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone shed some light upon the state of development > of these drivers? > I mean: the set of supported both NIC and kernel features. > Are both drivers supported by their authors, etc. eepro100 is unmaintained and going away. Jeff