From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261418AbVBWEGZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:06:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261422AbVBWEGZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:06:25 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([216.27.176.166]:42118 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261418AbVBWEGV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:06:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:06:16 -0800 From: Matt Mackall To: Andrew Morton Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch 0/6] Bind Mount Extensions 0.06 Message-ID: <20050223040616.GN3120@waste.org> References: <20050222120955.GA3682@mail.13thfloor.at> <20050223032413.GB3163@waste.org> <20050222195102.49cf37da.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222195102.49cf37da.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 07:51:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > Please give each patch a unique, descriptive subject. > > yup. > > > Summarizing what > > each patch is doing in your 0/n so that reviewers can focus on the > > bits that are interesting is also helpful. > > Actually, that's fairly irritating, because the 0/n contains useful info > which someone has to go and massage and copy into 1/n. Certainly, there should be nothing in the summary that isn't already in the patch itself. What I'm suggesting is more a table of contents: 1/6 move foo to bar so that we can then remove baz 2/6 kill references to baz ... -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.