From: Jarne Cook <jcook@siliconriver.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jarne Cook <jcook@siliconriver.com.au>
Subject: Complicated networking problem
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:59:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502281459.31402.jcook@siliconriver.com.au> (raw)
Hello all
(I am not subscribed. Please CC me)
Please forgive me if I have posed this message in the wrong place. I have
been searching for the answer for days with no resolve.
The question is:
How do I get eth0 and wlan0 both working together.
They are both using dhcp to the same simple network. That's right. Same
network. They both end up with gateway=192.168.0.1, netmask=255.255.255.0.
But ofcourse they do not have the same IP addresses.
I dont know if this matters but im using ISC's dhclient3.
This is what it looks like when wlan0 is brought up, followed by eth0.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:43:5F:E7:1D
inet addr:192.168.0.238 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::211:43ff:fe5f:e71d/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:277 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:60 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:24784 (24.2 KiB) TX bytes:9278 (9.0 KiB)
Interrupt:11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ifconfig wlan0
wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:F5:0C:D9:A3
inet addr:192.168.0.202 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::211:f5ff:fe0c:d9a3/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1538 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1085 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:203213 (198.4 KiB) TX bytes:130588 (127.5 KiB)
Interrupt:7 Memory:faff6000-faff7fff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ip rule list
0: from all lookup local
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ip route list table local
local 192.168.0.238 dev eth0 proto kernel scope host src 192.168.0.238
broadcast 192.168.0.255 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.202
broadcast 192.168.0.255 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.238
broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 192.168.0.202 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope host src 192.168.0.202
broadcast 192.168.0.0 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.202
broadcast 192.168.0.0 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.238
broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo proto kernel scope link src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.1 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ip route list table main
192.168.0.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.202
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.238
default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0
default via 192.168.0.1 dev wlan0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ip route list table default
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# iptables-save
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So.
Is there a way to allow an application which has bound to wlan0
(192.168.0.202) and an application bound to eth0 (192.168.0.238) both have
access to the internet at the same time, and not require an application to
bind to a different local address?
Thanks
Jarne
--
Jarne Cook <jcook@siliconriver.com.au>
Siliconriver.com.au
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-28 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-28 4:59 Jarne Cook [this message]
2005-03-01 2:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-03-01 2:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-02 3:24 ` Jarne Cook
2005-03-02 3:27 ` Jarne Cook
2005-03-02 3:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-03-02 4:56 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
[not found] <3CLkr-2LJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-03-01 1:21 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502281459.31402.jcook@siliconriver.com.au \
--to=jcook@siliconriver.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome