From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261592AbVCCMBA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:01:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261621AbVCCLJu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:09:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.mail.ru ([194.67.23.121]:53034 "EHLO mx1.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261540AbVCCKv0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:51:26 -0500 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Jaka =?utf-8?q?Mo=C4=8Dnik?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial fix for 2.6.11, initializing a few spin locks Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:51:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1109843825.29455.17.camel@x.at.lan> In-Reply-To: <1109843825.29455.17.camel@x.at.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200503031351.38860.adobriyan@mail.ru> X-Spam: Not detected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 March 2005 11:57, Jaka Močnik wrote: > this patch for 2.6.11 simply initializes a few spin locks that are being > reported as accessed prior to initalization on an embedded ppc system. Please, split'em. Put Signed-off-by right after changelog comment and _before_ the patch. > --- cut here --- This may screw scripts. "--- " sequence is magic. Oh, and don't put 2.6.11 in Subject and changelog. Alexey