From: domen@coderock.org
To: axboe@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, domen@coderock.org, nacc@us.ibm.com
Subject: [patch 06/15] block/xd: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep()
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:42:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050305224259.E16941F203@trashy.coderock.org> (raw)
Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. The current code wishes to sleep for 1 jiffy, but I am not
sure if this is actually intended, as with the change to HZ=1000, the time
equivalent of 1 jiffy changed from 10ms to 1ms. I have assumed the former in
this case; however the patch can be easily changed to assume the latter.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---
kj-domen/drivers/block/xd.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/block/xd.c~msleep-drivers_block_xd2 drivers/block/xd.c
--- kj/drivers/block/xd.c~msleep-drivers_block_xd2 2005-03-05 16:10:47.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/block/xd.c 2005-03-05 16:10:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/blkdev.h>
#include <linux/blkpg.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
@@ -529,10 +530,8 @@ static inline u_char xd_waitport (u_shor
int success;
xdc_busy = 1;
- while ((success = ((inb(port) & mask) != flags)) && time_before(jiffies, expiry)) {
- set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- schedule_timeout(1);
- }
+ while ((success = ((inb(port) & mask) != flags)) && time_before(jiffies, expiry))
+ msleep(10);
xdc_busy = 0;
return (success);
}
_
reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050305224259.E16941F203@trashy.coderock.org \
--to=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®