From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: domen@coderock.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de,
domen@coderock.org, nacc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 2/8] isdn/capi: replace interruptible_sleep_on() with wait_event_interruptible()
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:47:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050306194756.1d24dd0c.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050306223803.77C4F1EC90@trashy.coderock.org>
domen@coderock.org wrote:
>
>
>
> Use wait_event_interruptible() instead of the deprecated
> interruptible_sleep_on(). Patch is straight-forward as current sleep is
> conditionally looped. Patch is compile-tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
> ---
>
>
> kj-domen/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_isdn_capi_capi drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c
> --- kj/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c~int_sleep_on-drivers_isdn_capi_capi 2005-03-05 16:11:36.000000000 +0100
> +++ kj-domen/drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c 2005-03-05 16:11:36.000000000 +0100
> @@ -675,13 +675,8 @@ capi_read(struct file *file, char __user
> if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> - for (;;) {
> - interruptible_sleep_on(&cdev->recvwait);
> - if ((skb = skb_dequeue(&cdev->recvqueue)) != 0)
> - break;
> - if (signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> - }
> + wait_event_interruptible(cdev->recvwait,
> + ((skb = skb_dequeue(&cdev->recvqueue)) == 0));
> if (skb == 0)
> return -ERESTARTNOHAND;
> }
hmm, OK. Putting an expression with side-effect such as this into a macro
which evaluates the expression multiple times is a bit of a worry, but it
appears that everything will work OK.
That being said, I'd prefer that this come in via the ISDN team, after
having been tested please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-07 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 22:38 domen
2005-03-07 3:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-03-07 8:35 ` Domen Puncer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050306194756.1d24dd0c.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome