From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: More trouble with i386 EFLAGS and ptrace
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:06:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050313200626.GB21521@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503130827.j2D8RwBn025542@magilla.sf.frob.com>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 12:27:58AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This patch further cleans up the appearance of TF in eflags when ptrace is
> involved. With this, PTRACE_SINGLESTEP will not cause TF to appear in
> eflags as seen by PTRACE_GETREGS and the like, when the instruction faulted
> for some reason other than the single-step trap.
>
> This moves the check added by Dan's patch from setup_sigcontext to
> handle_signal. This is a cosmetic difference, but I think it makes more
> sense to consolidate all the "reset registers to canonical state" work in
> the same place (i.e. put it with the syscall rollback code), separate from
> the signal handler setup. The change that matters is moving the similar
> check out of do_debug, where it only covers the case of a single-step trap.
> Instead, it goes into the ptrace_signal_deliver macro, which is called
> before the ptrace stop for whatever signal results from whatever kind of
> fault in that instruction (or asynchronous signal). With that, the
> handle_signal check is still needed only for the case of PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
> with a handled signal.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
Thanks, looks right to me!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-13 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-06 19:38 Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-06 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-06 21:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-06 21:22 ` Roland McGrath
2005-03-06 22:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <200503070316.j273Gb4G027048@magilla.sf.frob.com>
2005-03-07 4:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-07 21:29 ` Roland McGrath
2005-03-09 0:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-13 8:27 ` Roland McGrath
2005-03-13 20:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-03-07 19:13 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-06 20:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-14 4:06 Jesse Allen
2005-03-14 4:12 Jesse Allen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050313200626.GB21521@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome