mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inode_lock heavily contended in 2.6.11
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:12:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050313211234.14a1d24f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16949.4010.174143.391599@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>

Peter Chubb <peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
>
> 
> When running reaim7 on a 12-way IA64 on an ext2 filesystem on a ram
> disc, I see very heavy contention on inode_lock.

Yes, that's a big global lock, protecting global resources.  I always
expected it to hit someone's fan, but it never did.

> lockstat output shows:
> 
> SPINLOCKS         HOLD            WAIT
>   UTIL  CON    MEAN(  MAX )   MEAN(  MAX )(% CPU)     TOTAL NOWAIT SPIN RJECT  NAME
>  46.8% 52.4%  1.9us( 130us)   20us(8073us)(21.5%)   5072151 47.6% 52.4%    0%  inode_lock
>  15.9% 59.5%  3.8us(  61us)   18us(7067us)( 3.9%)    852983 40.5% 59.5%    0%    __sync_single_inode+0xf0
>   9.2% 59.0%  1.2us(  25us)   20us(8073us)( 7.8%)   1596487 41.0% 59.0%    0%    generic_osync_inode+0xe0
> 
>  (etc).
> 
> Is anyone else seeing this on more realistic workloads?

An fsync/O_SYNC-intensive workload on a ram disk is likely to bring it out,
yes.  But once one has real disks under there, the acquisition frequency
will fall a lot.

Unless people are being all shy again, I don't think anyone has hit
significant inode_lock problems on more real-world things.


      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-14  5:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-14  4:14 Peter Chubb
2005-03-14  5:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050313211234.14a1d24f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®