From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262266AbVCOFOv (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:14:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262260AbVCOFOl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:14:41 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:40380 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262261AbVCOFOg (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:14:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:14:21 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: moreau francis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TTY] overrun notify issue during 5 minutes after booting Message-Id: <20050314211421.77652d4a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050314141754.8178.qmail@web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050314141754.8178.qmail@web25108.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org moreau francis wrote: > > By the way, is it safe in "n_tty_receive_overrun" to > call > "printk" ? because the former can be called from IT > context... yup. printk() is safe from all contexts except NMI.