From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261560AbVCOGAV (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:00:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262274AbVCOGAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:00:20 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:47303 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261560AbVCOGAQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 01:00:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:59:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Lameter Cc: nikita@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm counter operations through macros Message-Id: <20050314215958.15544c65.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050311182500.GA4185@redhat.com> <16946.62799.737502.923025@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20050314214506.050efadf.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I don't think the MM_COUNTER_T macro adds much, really. How about this? > > Then you wont be able to get rid of the counters by > > #define MM_COUNTER(xx) > > anymore. Why would we want to do that?