From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262040AbVCOWl2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:41:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262074AbVCOWk1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:40:27 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:17825 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262040AbVCOWhN (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:37:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:37:11 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] CON_BOOT Message-Id: <20050315143711.4ae21d88.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050315222706.GI21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20050315222706.GI21986@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > + if (console_drivers && (console_drivers->flags & CON_BOOT)) { > + unregister_console(console_drivers); > + console->flags &= ~CON_PRINTBUFFER; > + } > + Should we support more than a single CON_BOOT-labelled driver?