From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262171AbVCPA4V (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:56:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262201AbVCPA4V (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:56:21 -0500 Received: from hacksaw.org ([66.92.70.107]:30655 "EHLO hacksaw.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262171AbVCPA4Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:56:16 -0500 Message-Id: <200503160056.j2G0u0hu003278@hacksaw.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Greg KH cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.4 In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:23:25 PST." <20050316002325.GA30645@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:56:00 -0500 From: Hacksaw Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + while (dlen >= 2 && dlen >= data[1] && data[1] >= 2) { Not that it matters much to me, since I don't have to maintain it, but couldn't this be: while (data[1] >= 2 && dlen >= data[1]) { I think this captures the relationship and priority. -- http://www.hacksaw.org -- http://www.privatecircus.com -- KB1FVD