mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mika Kukkonen <mikukkon@gmail.com>
Cc: ambx1@neo.rr.com, perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix compile warning in drivers/pnp/resource.c with !CONFIG_PCI
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:01:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050321220100.1fe68929.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4301cff605032110402f521ce8@mail.gmail.com>

Mika Kukkonen <mikukkon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
>  With !CONFIG_PCI I get following warning:
> 
>    CC      drivers/pnp/resource.o
>  drivers/pnp/resource.c:24: warning: `pnp_skip_pci_scan' defined but not used
> 
>  Two ways to fix this, first one would be to simply #ifdef the
>  variable. But the variable
>  in question is not (according to cscope) actually used outside this
>  one other place (and reason why it became a warning now is that Adrian
>  made it static), and so the code inside CONFIG_PCI is actually relying
>  on the fact that the variable is implicitly initialized to 0.
>  So the patch just deletes the variable.

Well Adam might actually have meant to set pnp_skip_pci_scan with a __setup
thingy.

Your patch was wildly wordwrapped.

We have a cute macro for that pci_dev walk.

I queued this up:


--- 25/drivers/pnp/resource.c~fix-compile-warning-in-drivers-pnp-resourcec-with-config_pci	2005-03-21 21:57:11.000000000 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/drivers/pnp/resource.c	2005-03-21 21:58:49.000000000 -0800
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 #include <linux/pnp.h>
 #include "base.h"
 
-static int pnp_skip_pci_scan;				/* skip PCI resource scanning */
 static int pnp_reserve_irq[16] = { [0 ... 15] = -1 };	/* reserve (don't use) some IRQ */
 static int pnp_reserve_dma[8] = { [0 ... 7] = -1 };	/* reserve (don't use) some DMA */
 static int pnp_reserve_io[16] = { [0 ... 15] = -1 };	/* reserve (don't use) some I/O region */
@@ -385,9 +384,9 @@ int pnp_check_irq(struct pnp_dev * dev, 
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
 	/* check if the resource is being used by a pci device */
-	if (!pnp_skip_pci_scan) {
-		struct pci_dev * pci = NULL;
-		while ((pci = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pci)) != NULL) {
+	{
+		struct pci_dev *pci = NULL;
+		for_each_pci_dev(pci) {
 			if (pci->irq == *irq)
 				return 0;
 		}
_


      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-22  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-21 18:40 Mika Kukkonen
2005-03-22  6:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050321220100.1fe68929.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikukkon@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®