From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262386AbVCVLoi (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:44:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262647AbVCVLoh (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:44:37 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:21975 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262386AbVCVLoZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:44:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:43:32 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Norbert Preining Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: S2R gone with 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 Message-Id: <20050322034332.4e1814d1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050322110610.GB1940@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20050321210411.GB29072@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <20050321132106.3cb48d38.akpm@osdl.org> <20050322110610.GB1940@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Norbert Preining wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mär 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Sorry to bother you again, but I found that S2R does not work anymore > > > with 2.6.12-rc1-mm1, while it works with the exact same software setup > > > with 2.6.11-mm4. > > > > Oh. suspend-to-RAM. > > > > Would this be an ACPI regression? > > Sorry for the S2R. I guess that it is related to the new ACPI stuff > introduced in bk-acpi lately. What would you suggest: Well if you could test 2.6.12-rc1 plus rc1-mm1's bk-apci.patch, that would confirm your theory. Apart from that - please raise a bugzilla entry for the acpi guys.