From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262586AbVCWBKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:10:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262686AbVCWBKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:10:40 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:54694 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262586AbVCWBKf (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:10:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:10:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] freepgt: free_pgtables use vma list Message-Id: <20050322171013.5c52dd18.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > > But I'm still confused by all the math on addr/end at each > > level. > > You think the rest of us are not ;-? umm, given the difficulty which you guys are having with this, I get a bit worried about clarity, simplicity and maintainability of the end result.