From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/08] scsi: fix hot unplug sequence
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:15:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050325031511.GA22114@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111711558.5612.52.camel@mulgrave>
Hello, James and Jens.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:45:58PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:25 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Let me guess, it is hanging in wait_for_completion()?
>
> Yes, I have the trace now. Why is curious. This is the trace of the
> failure:
>
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: usb 4-2: USB disconnect, address 3
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: CMD c25c98b0 done, completing
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: 0:0:0:0: cmd c25c98b0 returning
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: 0:0:0:0: cmd c25c98b0 going out <6>Read Capacity (10) 25 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to dead device (req c25c98b0)
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 4
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
> Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: 1:0:0:0: cmd c1a1b4b0 going out <6>Inquiry 12 00 00 00 24 00
>
> The problem occurs when the mid-layer rejects the I/O to the dead
> device. Here it returns BLKPREP_KILL to the prep function, but after
> that we never get a completion back.
I think I found the cause. Special requests submitted using
scsi_do_req() never initializes ->end_io(). Normally, SCSI midlayer
terminates special requests inside the SCSI midlayer without passing
through the blkdev layer. However, if a device is going away or taken
offline, blkdev layer gets to terminate special requests and, as
->end_io() is never set-up, nothing happens and the completion gets
lost.
The following patch implements scsi_do_req_endio() and sets up
->end_io() and ->end_io_data before sending out special commands.
It's a quick fix & hacky. I think the proper fix might be one of
* Don't return BLKPREP_KILL in the prep_fn and always terminate
special commands inside request_fn without using end_that_*
functions.
* I don't really know why the scsi_request/scsi_cmnd distincion
is made (resource usage?), but, if it's a legacy thing, replace
scsi_request with scsi_cmnd; then we can BLKPREP_KILL without using
dummy scsi_cmnd.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2005/03/25 11:57:25+09:00 tj@htj.dyndns.org
# midlayer special command termination fix
#
# drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
# 2005/03/25 11:57:17+09:00 tj@htj.dyndns.org +30 -0
# midlayer special command termination fix
#
diff -Nru a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2005-03-25 11:59:28 +09:00
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2005-03-25 11:59:28 +09:00
@@ -274,6 +274,33 @@
}
/*
+ * Special requests usually gets terminated inside scsi midlayer
+ * proper; however, they can be terminated by the blkdev layer when
+ * scsi_prep_fn() returns BLKPREP_KILL or scsi_request_fn() detects
+ * offline condition. The following callback is invoked when the
+ * blkdev layer terminates a special request. Emulate DID_NO_CONNECT.
+ */
+static void scsi_do_req_endio(struct request *rq)
+{
+ struct scsi_request *sreq = rq->end_io_data;
+ struct request_queue *q = sreq->sr_device->request_queue;
+ struct scsi_cmnd cmd;
+
+ memset(&cmd, 0, sizeof(cmd));
+ cmd.device = sreq->sr_device;
+ scsi_init_cmd_from_req(&cmd, sreq);
+ /* Our command is dummy, nullify back link. */
+ sreq->sr_command = NULL;
+
+ sreq->sr_result = cmd.result = DID_NO_CONNECT << 16;
+
+ /* The sreq->done() callback expects queue_lock to be unlocked. */
+ spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
+ cmd.done(&cmd);
+ spin_lock(q->queue_lock);
+}
+
+/*
* Function: scsi_do_req
*
* Purpose: Queue a SCSI request
@@ -326,6 +353,9 @@
if (sreq->sr_cmd_len == 0)
sreq->sr_cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(sreq->sr_cmnd[0]);
+
+ sreq->sr_request->end_io = scsi_do_req_endio;
+ sreq->sr_request->end_io_data = sreq;
/*
* head injection *required* here otherwise quiesce won't work
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-25 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 2:14 [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 00/08] scsi: small fixes & cleanups Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 01/08] scsi: remove unused bounce-buffer release path Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:07 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 6:08 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 02/08] scsi: don't use blk_insert_request() for requeueing Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 03/08] scsi: remove unused scsi_cmnd->internal_timeout field Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 04/08] scsi: remove meaningless volatile qualifiers from structure definitions Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 4:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-23 5:28 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 15:16 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 05/08] scsi: remove a timer race from scsi_queue_insert() and cleanup timer Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 06/08] scsi: remove meaningless scsi_cmnd->serial_number_at_timeout field Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 07/08] scsi: remove bogus {get|put}_device() calls Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-29 17:02 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/08] scsi: fix hot unplug sequence Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:08 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 4:50 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-23 15:20 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-25 0:45 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-25 3:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-03-25 5:02 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-25 5:38 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-25 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-25 21:43 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-25 22:49 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-26 7:27 ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-26 14:48 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 15:12 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050325031511.GA22114@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®