mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.30-rc2
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:34:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050326113426.GO30052@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050326004631.GC17637@logos.cnet>

Marcelo,

just another one and that's all. Zachary Amsden found an unconditional
write to a debug register in the signal delivery path which is only
needed when we use a breakpoint. This is a very expensive operation on
x86, and doing it conditionnaly enhanced signal delivery speed by 33%
for him.

His patch got merged in 2.6.10, and I've merged it a month ago in my
local tree. Could we get it in 2.4.30, please ?

Thanks in advance,
Willy

--

I noticed an unneeded write to dr7 in the signal handling path for x86.  
We only need to write to dr7 if there is a breakpoint to re-enable, and 
MOVDR is a serializing instruction, which is expensive.  Getting rid of 
it gets a 33% faster signal delivery path (at least on Xeon - I didn't 
test other CPUs, so your gain may vary).

Cheers,

Zachary Amsden
zach@vmware.com

--------------070400020104010700090602
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="README.i386-fast-signal"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="README.i386-fast-signal"

Optimize away the unconditional write to debug registers on signal delivery
path.  This is already done on x86_64.  Measured delta TSC for three paths
on a 2.4GHz Xeon.

1) With unconditional write to dr7 :  800-1000 cycles
2) With conditional write to dr7   :  84-112 cycles
3) With unlikely write to dr7      :  84 cycles

Performance test using divzero microbenchmark (3 million divide by zeros):

With unconditional write: 
   7.445 real / 6.136 system
   7.529 real / 6.482 system
   7.541 real / 5.974 system
   7.546 real / 6.217 system
   7.445 real / 6.167 system

With unlikely write:
   5.779 real / 4.518 system
   5.783 real / 4.591 system
   5.552 real / 4.569 system
   5.790 real / 4.528 system
   5.554 real / 4.382 system

That's about a 33% speedup - more than I expected; apparently getting rid
of the serializing instruction makes the do_signal path much faster.

Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com)

--------------070400020104010700090602
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="i386-fast-signal.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="i386-fast-signal.patch"

[hand-edited line numbers to match 2.4]
--- linux-2.6.10-rc1/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c	2004-10-25 11:15:43.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc1-nsz/arch/i386/kernel/signal.c	2004-10-26 14:30:54.000000000 -0700
@@ -600,7 +600,9 @@
 		 * have been cleared if the watchpoint triggered
 		 * inside the kernel.
 		 */
-		__asm__("movl %0,%%db7"	: : "r" (current->thread.debugreg[7]));
+		if (unlikely(current->thread.debugreg[7])) {
+			__asm__("movl %0,%%db7"	: : "r" (current->thread.debugreg[7]));
+		}
 
 		/* Whee!  Actually deliver the signal.  */
 		handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-26 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-26  0:46 Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-26 10:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-26 10:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-26 10:59 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-26 21:41   ` David S. Miller
2005-03-26 11:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-26 11:44   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-26 12:27     ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-26 16:07     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-03-26 11:34 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2005-03-26 11:46   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-03-26 12:29     ` Willy Tarreau
2005-03-27 17:50   ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050326113426.GO30052@alpha.home.local \
    --to=willy@w.ods.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®