From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262161AbVC2Cz5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:55:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262162AbVC2Cz4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:55:56 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-174.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.174]:18388 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262161AbVC2Czv (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:55:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:54:08 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: ananth@in.ibm.com Cc: wcohen@redhat.com, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kprobe_handler should check pre_handler function Message-Id: <20050328185408.4b0e215c.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20050329023408.GA4847@in.ibm.com> References: <424872C8.6080207@redhat.com> <20050329023408.GA4847@in.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:34:08 -0500 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > You are right. The check for pre_handler is needed and here is a patch > against 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 that does this. The sparc64 part looks just fine.