From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261461AbVC2VsQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:48:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261452AbVC2VsO (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:48:14 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:43493 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261461AbVC2Vr4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:47:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:47:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: wendyx@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup newly added jsm driver Message-Id: <20050329134734.71c16b54.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050329210735.GA5664@lst.de> References: <20050329210735.GA5664@lst.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > One more prematurely added drivers.. This driver was first sent out for review a month ago, was upissued twice and generated over seventy linux-kernel emails including some from Russell and some from Greg. It was by no means a "premature" addition. One could say that it was inadequately reviewed, but how is one to determine that? If the thing has been under discussion for a month and the submitter says "I've addressed all comments" then it's going to get merged.