From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261423AbVCaNA5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:00:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261424AbVCaNA5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:00:57 -0500 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.198]:28086 "EHLO moskovskaya.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261423AbVCaNAp (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:00:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:00:17 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Denis Vlasenko Cc: Jeff Garzik , Yum Rayan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce stack usage in time.c Message-ID: <20050331130017.GA19294@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <424BB443.1070508@pobox.com> <200503311226.58037.vda@ilport.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200503311226.58037.vda@ilport.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 March 2005 12:26:58 +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > Is this a syscall? > Is it ever called from some deeply nested kernel function? Never showed up in any of my callchain-tests. I'd leave it as is. Jörn -- When I am working on a problem I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong. -- R. Buckminster Fuller