From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net,
jlan@engr.sgi.com, efocht@hpce.nec.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
gh@us.ibm.com, elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: [1/1] CBUS: new very fast (for insert operations) message bus based on kenel connector.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:27:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050331162758.44aeaf44.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050320112336.2b082e27@zanzibar.2ka.mipt.ru>
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to annouce CBUS - ultra fast (for insert operations)
> message bus.
> +static int cbus_enqueue(struct cbus_event_container *c, struct cn_msg *msg)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct cbus_event *event;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + event = kmalloc(sizeof(*event) + msg->len, GFP_ATOMIC);
Using GFP_ATOMIC is a bit lame. It would be better to require the caller
to pass in the gfp_flags. Or simply require that all callers not hold
locks and use GFP_KERNEL.
> +static int cbus_process(struct cbus_event_container *c, int all)
> +{
> + struct cbus_event *event;
> + int len, i, num;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&c->event_list))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (all)
> + len = c->qlen;
> + else
> + len = 1;
> +
> + num = 0;
> + for (i=0; i<len; ++i) {
> + event = cbus_dequeue(c);
> + if (!event)
> + continue;
> +
> + cn_netlink_send(&event->msg, 0);
> + num++;
> +
> + kfree(event);
> + }
> +
> + return num;
> +}
It might be cleaner to pass in an item count rather than a boolean `all'
here. Then again, it seems racy.
The initial list_empty() call could fail to detect new events due to lack
of locking and memory barriers.
We conventionally code for loops as
for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +static int cbus_event_thread(void *data)
> +{
> + int i, non_empty = 0, empty = 0;
> + struct cbus_event_container *c;
> +
> + daemonize(cbus_name);
> + allow_signal(SIGTERM);
> + set_user_nice(current, 19);
Please use the kthread api for managing this thread.
Is a new kernel thread needed?
> + while (!cbus_need_exit) {
> + if (empty || non_empty == 0 || non_empty > 10) {
> + interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&cbus_wait_queue, 10);
interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() is heavily deprecated and is racy without
external locking (it pretty much has to be the BKL). Use wait_event_timeout().
> +int __devinit cbus_init(void)
> +{
> + int i, err = 0;
> + struct cbus_event_container *c;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i) {
> + c = &per_cpu(cbus_event_list, i);
> + cbus_init_event_container(c);
> + }
> +
> + init_completion(&cbus_thread_exited);
> +
> + cbus_pid = kernel_thread(cbus_event_thread, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
Using the kthread API would clean this up.
> + if (IS_ERR((void *)cbus_pid)) {
The weird cast here might not even work at all on 64-bit architectures. It
depends if they sign extend ints when casting them to pointers. I guess
they do. If cbus_pid is indeed an s32.
Much better to do
if (cbus_pid < 0)
> +void __devexit cbus_fini(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct cbus_event_container *c;
> +
> + cbus_need_exit = 1;
> + kill_proc(cbus_pid, SIGTERM, 0);
> + wait_for_completion(&cbus_thread_exited);
> +
> + for_each_cpu(i) {
> + c = &per_cpu(cbus_event_list, i);
> + cbus_fini_event_container(c);
> + }
> +}
I think this is racy. What stops new events from being queued while this
function is in progress?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-01 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-20 8:23 Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 0:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-01 6:43 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 7:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 7:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 8:50 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 10:16 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 10:30 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 10:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 11:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 13:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 19:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-02 15:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050331162758.44aeaf44.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
--cc=elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
--cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome